4.) Everything is dual. Everything has poles. Everything has its pair of opposites. Like and Unlike are the same. Opposites are identical in nature, but different in degree. Extremes meet. All truths are but half truths. All paradoxes may be reconciled.
5.) Gender is in everything. Everything has its masculine and feminine principals. Gender manifests on all planes.
6.) Everything flows out and in. Everything has its tides. All things rise and fall. The pendulum-swing manifests in everything. The measure of the swing to the right is the measure of the swing to the left. Rhythm compensates.
7.) Every cause has its effect, every effect its cause. Everything happens according to law. Chance is but a name for law not recognized.There are many planes of causation, but nothing escapes the law.
Assume for a moment that we live in a world that is not as it
appears. A frame of reference would be if you were born into a very
large fishbowl so large you could never reach the glass edges or perhaps a
giant wildlife preserve surrounded by an endless desert. In this hypothetical situation, your environment is artificial. However you grew up in this environment
as did many, many, many generations of people before you and so this is
what everybody knows to be true and natural and all there is. This is
your unquestionable reality. So how do you go about finding out the truth? Let’s say you can’t articulate it but you know something just isn’t right with your environment – your intuition tells you so – therefore you have decided to find out for yourself if some of the things you were taught are really true.
You are taught about your reality
including its limitations and if you ever question these limitations you
are ridiculed and disparaged and the highly regarded professional
readers of books based off of other books written by other professional
readers of books who teach you say, “…explorers and scientists have
proved the word is this way and that’s just how it is and you must
accept it or you are a fool…” However, in this scenario, there also
exist strange ancient texts of long forgotten languages carved into
stones older than man has supposedly been on Earth as well as megalithic
structures so large and so mathematically precise that they contradict
all the professional readers of books – so they refuse to acknowledge
these discoveries for doing so would mean they would have to start over
and admit that they didn’t know as much as they wished they did. As far
as the mysterious ancient languages – none but a very scarce number of
elderly researchers can read portions of these languages yet in fact,
the few of them that do exist do not necessarily agree with each others translations.
Now you have found yourself at an impasse.
The only way you are able to know for certain that what you were taught
is accurate means raising an impossible amount of money in order to
fund an expedition to an area where the military won’t let you go OR
become the inventor of a technology which currently does not exist and
will require a great many hours and an impossible amount of money to
develop. After which, even if you were to succeed, your new- fangled
technology would likely just be seized by the military who would
threaten you with federal prison time should you continue down that path
of inquiry again. Now during all this time, rumors abound
(supposedly from inventors and researchers who used to work under the
supervision of the government) that many of the things you were taught
are indeed wrong. Not wrong on account of ignorance but by design – to
purposely keep you and everyone else in the dark about many things.
This is where one must make a choice. Either you attempt to deduce
what is true using a particular method of reasoning (take the red pill),
or give up (take the blue pill).
I took the red pill and
after much thinking, I decided it may just be possible to discern the
truth using a method called “reductio ad absurdum” – a method often used
in logic and mathematical proofs. You start by assuming something to be
true, and then by a chain of logical deductions you come to the
conclusion that your assumption either cannot be true or cannot be
(“Reductio ad absurdum” (Latin for “reduction to
absurdity”; or argumentum ad absurdum, “argument to absurdity”) is a
type of argument which attempts either to disprove a theory by showing
it inevitably leads to a ridiculous, absurd, or impractical conclusion,
or to prove a theory by showing that if it were not true, the result
would be absurd or impossible. I urge you to try this method of
deduction. Assume all is true that you cannot prove yourself…and slowly
eliminate these assumptions using deductive reasoning.)
This site is not for everyone but for those whom it IS for…nothing is more helpful for your preparation to take the next step into consciousness.
For my entire life the name Cassiopeia sounded so familiar to me but I couldn’t figure out why. Of course I knew it was a constellation, but beyond that it felt familiar. So one day I decided to search the name on the internet and see what I found. I was very pleased when I found this site. This site is pretty esoteric and it is not meant for very many of you and it does not claim to be for everyone, not even that many people. My intuition led me here. However, I feel I should post it for those of you who are attempting to learn what is not made available and to grow and strengthen parts of yourself you were never told existed.
George Soros is a Jew and he survived WW2 by infiltrating Jewish hideouts and then betraying them to the Germans to be sent off to the camps to be killed. This man has no soul. He has no allegiance. He is pure evil. He is the devil himself. He needs to be condemned by all people on this earth. He needs us all to collectively turn our backs on him. To strip him of his power and influence.
WE MUST UNITE IN THE FACE OF EVERYONE TRYING TO DIVIDE US.
WE ARE ALL HUMAN BEINGS. WE ALL LOVE ONE ANOTHER.
WE ALL MUST TRUST ONE ANOTHER.
WE MUST STOP LETTING OURSELVES FALL PREY TO PARASITES SUCH AS MEN LIKE HIM.
I don’t know….I’m not a practicing christian in case this is in reference to any of my posts…I don’t believe I have mentioned Jesus in anything. I consider myself very spiritual and I DO believe in Jesus, Buddah, Krishna, Muhammad, Moses. Native American legends, Viking legends, many ancient legends from all over the world and many in every religion – however, I believe they must be interpreted very carefully – for they are somewhat encoded or explained the best our ancestors knew how to explain the things they saw with a limited understanding of technology, the multidimensional multiverse, the expansion of human consciousness, their own true history, the reason for reincarnation, the meaning for life, earth as a living conscious life form of itself, human ascension, the astral plane, the multiverse in general, etheric beings, etc.
I try to keep an open mind. I think our ancestors were much more intelligent than we give them credit for. I believe they wrote about true events – I don’t believe greek mythology is purely myth either.